Fruitarian Diets: Pro and Con
by Tom Billings
Copyright © 1996-2001 by Thomas E. Billings; all rights reserved.

Editorial Note (1):
This is a revision of an article, the first issue of which was written in 1996. Although the article was (partially) updated in uploading it here, readers should be aware that it might not fully represent my current views. I am making it available on the web, as parts of it may be helpful or relevant to others who are considering a fruitarian diet.

Introduction.

This paper is based on my direct experience as a fruitarian, and on my observation of, and association with, fruitarians over a period spanning many years. I was a fruitarian for most of the 1970's, when I lived in Florida. See my dietary bio on the Beyond Veg website for details. I no longer follow a fruitarian diet; instead I strongly recommend that others follow a more diverse (less extreme) and more balanced diet.

Definition of Fruitarianism:

Fruitarianism is defined as a diet that is predominantly raw fruit (75+% by weight), with the remainder of the diet being composed of raw vegetarian (raw vegan) foods. Here fruit has the common definition, i.e., the reproductive parts of a vine, bush, or tree, that includes a juicy pulp. The common definition is used here rather than the botanical, as the botanical definition is too broad, e.g., grain is considered a fruit under the botanical definition (but not the common definition).

Summary Statement on Fruitarianism:

Fruitarianism is possible according to idealistic dietary theory, but it can be very difficult in practice. The diet has many pitfalls that can cause serious problems for the would-be fruitarian. Fruitarianism portrays fruit as the ideal natural food, yet modern fruit is the product of generations (in some cases, thousands of years) of human-directed plant breeding. In short, modern fruit has been bred for a high sugar content, and is greatly over-rated as a food.

Very few people claim to succeed on the fruitarian diet, in the long term. Additionally, the high incidence of binge eating, "cheating," and backsliding in raw veganism raises serious questions regarding the credibility of the few claims of long-term success. Here, one should apply common sense: there are very few long-term success stories, and even fewer credible success stories for fruitarianism. Does that suggest that it is the "ideal, natural" diet for everyone, as its advocates claim, or a fringe diet that appeals primarily to idealists? This question deserves serious consideration, particularly if you are considering adopting the diet, as you may be putting your health at risk.

Fruitarianism: Pro

Fruitarianism: Con

An Alternative: A Near Fruitarian Diet

[This section, which appeared in earlier versions, has been deleted. It described a high-fruit diet that is more diverse than the fruitarian diet. Such diets do work better than strict fruitarian diets, but they also have a poor long-term track record. I deleted the section to prevent some readers from interpreting it as an endorsement of diets similar or close to fruitarianism. I do not advocate any specific diet, and want to warn others of the risks of fruitarian and similar diets.]

Neutral Fruit:
Is it the Solution to Excess Sugar in Modern, Cultivated Fruit?

The term neutral fruit refers to fruits that are neither sweet nor acid. This includes many "vegetable fruits": tomatoes, sweet peppers, zucchini, eggplant, cucumbers. However, these fruits also present problems if one tries to make them the basis of a diet:

Question: What do you call someone on a long-term, (nearly) mono-diet of cucumbers?

Answer: In my opinion, the term anoretic provides the most accurate description. The other relevant term is fake unless the individual shows extreme weight loss.

Neutral fruit, primarily cucumbers and some tomatoes, can be part of your diet, but are not a sufficient basis for a diet for most people. (They do not provide adequate calories, unless one consumes huge quantities of them.) Some fruitarian and raw vegan diet advocates suggest that you emphasize neutral fruit if you have trouble with the high sugar content of sweet fruit. Be aware that you may experience severe weight loss if your diet is based on cucumbers. (Once again, reality contradicts idealistic dietary theory.)

Epilogue

Don't try fruitarianism out of fear of cooked food, mucus or protein. If you choose to try fruitarianism, do so ONLY if you have clear, positive reasons to motivate you, and do watch for signs of ALL the potential problems listed here. A fruitarian diet that includes protein foods and leafy greens will pose fewer risks/problems than a 100% fruit diet. The information in this article is offered in the hope that it may help those who are considering fruitarianism.

Some readers of this article may think the difficulties of fruitarianism are exaggerated here: they are not, but you are of course free to find out the hard way, if you prefer. To anyone on a fruitarian diet, or contemplating one, I wish you good luck: you will probably need it!

Editorial note (2):
The term anorexic is often used to denote a person suffering from anorexia nervosa. However, the proper use of the term anorexic is as an adjective. The correct noun to use is anoretic or the alternative spelling, anorectic. See the footnotes on pp. 2-3 of the book Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia by Marya Hornbacher (1998, Harper Flamingo, New York) for a discussion of this issue.

--Thomas E. Billings


For email contact with the author, follow the link below.

Return to Fruitarian Archive main page